Prayer and Action Alert: U.S. House of Representatives to Vote Tuesday, December 5, or Wednesday, December 6, on the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act

"Between weeks 20 and 30, [of gestation] an unborn baby has more pain receptors, per square inch, than at any other time before or after birth, with only a thin layer of skin for protection." Douglas Johnson/AH (Dec 1st, 2006)

National Right to Life reminds all those concerned for the lives of unborn babies that the U.S. House of Representatives will be voting on the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act beginning either Tues. Dec. 5th, or Wed. Dec. 6th.

To view an informative, and scientific fact sheet on fetal pain, CLICK HERE.
For more information on the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, follow the link below.


Source: Christian Newswire

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here are some more links with more info: PLEASE CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY TO VOTE YES FOR the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act~GLENN T

Contact: Douglas Johnson, National Right to Life Committee Federal Legislation Department, 202-626-8820

WASHINGTON, Dec. 1 /Christian Newswire/ -- This is an update from the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), issued Friday, December 1, 2006, at 12:30 PM EST. For further information on this issue, contact the NRLC Federal Legislation Department at 202-626-8820 or Legfederal@aol.com.

A recent statement by the National Abortion Federation, urging House members to oppose the legislation, here. The National Abortion Federation is an association of abortionists.

A 2005 statement by NARAL stating that the organization "does not intend to oppose" the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act, here.

An NRLC factsheet summarizing the science on fetal pain, here (PDF file).

An NRLC memo rebutting an article on fetal pain published by JAMA in August 2005, here. The JAMA article, often cited by opponents of the bill, claimed that available research suggests that the human fetus does not experience pain until about 29 weeks. As the NRLC memo and the linked documents demonstrate, the JAMA paper has been contradicted by some highly credentialed authorities in the field, and is inconsistent with longstanding observations and treatment of newborns who survive long-term after being born as early as 23 weeks. Moreover, the lead author of the JAMA article, a medical student, was previously an attorney for NARAL, and one of the other authors is a longtime activist who runs the largest abortion clinic in San Francisco, performs hundreds of late abortions every year, and has been a leading critic of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. According to an article by the medical writer for the Philadelphia Inquirer, who brought these associations to the attention of the JAMA editor after JAMA published the paper, "JAMA editor-in-chief Catherine D. DeAngelis said she was unaware of this, and acknowledged it might create an appearance of bias that could hurt the journal's credibility. 'This is the first I've heard about it,' she said. 'We ask them to reveal any conflict of interest. I would have published' the disclosure if it had been made.")

For further information on this issue, contact the NRLC Federal Legislation Department at 202-626-8820 or Legfederal@aol.com, or visit the NRLC website section devoted to documentation regarding the pain of unborn children, here.

Issuers of press releases and not Earned Media™ are solely responsible for the accuracy of the content. Terms and conditions, including restrictions on redistribution, apply.

Copyright © 2006 Earned Media™. All Rights Reserved