There should be a moral outcry!

What is it all about...An HONEST ADMISSION!

The covers are coming off Roe v Wade!

There should be a MORAL OUTCRY! NO MORE NAPPING...

AMERICA IT IS TIME TO AWAKEN TO JUSTICE & TRUTH for the UNBORN!

---

---

LAW OF THE LAND
Ginsburg: I thought Roe was to rid undesirables
Justice discusses 'growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of'

---

Posted: July 08, 2009
9:46 pm Eastern

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

In an astonishing admission, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she was under the impression that legalizing abortion with the 1973 Roe. v. Wade case would eliminate undesirable members of the populace, or as she put it "populations that we don't want to have too many of."

Her remarks, set to be published in the New York Times Magazine this Sunday but viewable online now, came in an in-depth interview with Emily Bazelon titled, "The Place of Women on the Court."

The 16-year veteran of the high court was asked if she were a lawyer again, what would she "want to accomplish as a future feminist legal agenda."

Ride for Life Fundraiser

Saturday, August 29, 2009

The Ride for Life is a motorcycle ride to promote life, pray for life and raise funds for the Vermont Right to Life Committee. The riders will cross the State of Vermont from East to West beginning in St. Johnsbury, stopping in Barre, Montpelier, Williston and Burlington to pray.

Registration is 7:00am - 8:00am at the New Beginnings Christian Center, St. Johnsbury.

Following the ride is a barbecue provided by the United Christian Assembly in Jericho. For more information contact: Vermont Right to Life 802-229-4885

vrlc@vrlc.net

It Does Matter

Posted by Ian Kelly on June 26, 2009 at 04:57PM.

I usually do not write blogs pertaining to an individuals comment on any of our material but I am about to make an exception.

OperationCounterStrike commented on our IntelliGender blog post:

"It doesn’t MATTER what the fetus is. What matters is WHERE it is. I say if something is inside my body, then I’m entitled to have it killed NO MATTER WHAT it is. Even if it’s a person. Even if it’s an INNOCENT person. If you were inside my body, then I’d be entitled to kill YOU! And vice versa."

This thinking is not constitutional. It’s as easy as that. No one has the right to deprive another person of the right to life without due process.(14th Amendment)

The Roe v. Wade ruling determined that, since "life" was unknown, the liberty interest of the woman to decide how to deal with her pregnancy must be paramount. In short, there was no "person" to protect. Justice Harry Blackmun, author of the majority opinion noted, however, that if "personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’s right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment (14th)."

Well there ya go. It’s not just us crazy pro-lifers that think people have the right to life but the Justice who authored the most controversial ruling to date.

What the fetus is DOES matter! At least according to the Constitution it does.