


Click Here to watch the trailer!

"Jesus, I plead your blood over my sins and the sins of my nation. God, end abortion and send revival to America."
Planned Parenthood faces criminal charges for aborting late-term babies in violation of Kansas state law. On Wednesday, Johnson County Prosecutor Phill Kline filed a 107-count indictment against the nation's largest abortion provider, specifically its Overland Park, Kan., affiliate. Johnson County District Judge James Vano found probable cause for the following charges:
The charges provide detailed evidence that Planned Parenthood was performing illegal late-term abortions by ignoring viability testing laws and regulations, and then falsifying documents in order to conceal and cover up those facts. The first hearing is set for Nov. 16.
Approximately 40 states - including Kansas - have laws banning most late-term abortions. Life advocates are urging an investigation into the other 859 Planned Parenthood facilities nationwide, which receive a combined $300 million a year in taxpayer dollars.
"Planned Parenthood is accused of falsifying records to cover up numerous violations of state law against aborting late-term babies," said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America. "Planned Parenthoods around the country receive federal funding, so our tax dollars may be subsidizing this alleged illegal activity.
"The Department of Health and Human Services should begin an immediate investigation to discover whether other Planned Parenthoods around the country engage in the same type of potentially illegal activities, violating state and federal law.?
Peter Brownlie, president and chief executive officer of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, told The Associated Press the clinic doesn't perform any late-term abortions.
"We always provide high-quality care in full accord with state and federal law," he said.
Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue, said he believes the 107 counts are just the tip of the iceberg.
"The charges filed Wednesday validate our claims that Planned Parenthood has been operating outside the law," he said. "We are grateful that there has been a breakthrough in the corrupt political system in Kansas that has for years looked the other way while abortionists blatantly disregarded the law at the cost of innocent lives. Now, finally, some measure of justice is being served."
Thanks to Citizenlink.org for this articlePlease continue to pray that President Bush will have the opportunity to appoint a 3rd. Supreme Court Justice on his watch!~Glenn
A President's Pull
Some political pundits are suggesting that the only thing the President of the United States does that influences the abortion issue is to appoint judges. While I certainly agree that judicial restraint is the primary concern of many in the pro-life community, it's naive to suggest it is the only concern. When it comes to judicial nominees there are no guarantees, as the Supreme Court picks of Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush would attest. A President's decisions on the sanctity of human life range much wider. It was President Reagan who adopted the "Mexico City Policy," barring U.S. foreign aid to organizations that performed and promoted abortion overseas and who cut off funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) because of its role in China's coercive abortion policy. It was under President Reagan that the U.S. blocked the use of federal funds for research using tissue from aborted babies. Additionally, President Reagan surrounded himself by strong pro-lifers and even wrote a long essay on the subject: Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation. President George H.W. Bush upheld President Reagan's pro-life policies, vetoing 10 bills that contained pro-abortion provisions, including four appropriations bills. These are just a few examples of many showing how a President can influence pro-life policy - it's not just the judges.
Article compliments of Tony Perkins W:FRC.org
In June, much of the media coverage focused on President Bush's veto of the Senate bill that would have required taxpayer funds for experimentation that destroys human embryos. What the President has accomplished on the issue since then is equally newsworthy. To encourage true research and progress, President Bush issued an Executive Order directing HHS Secretary Michael Leavitt to support projects that pursue "alternatives" to embryonic stem cells. Yesterday, the National Institute of Health (NIH) released its plan called, "Expanding Approved Stem Cell Lines in Ethically Responsible Ways." Considering the latest success stories for adult stem cells, NIH should have no shortage of projects to pursue. At the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, scientists have succeeded in "reprogramming" stem cells from mice testes into a host of tissue types. If the same results occur in humans, these adult stem cells could soon treat everything from brain disorders to heart disease. In Boston, medical researchers have been able to extract adult bone marrow cells and coax them to grow into tissue that can help replace dysfunctional heart valves. As scientist John Mayer emphasized, "These are stem cells derived from bone marrow, [but] they are not embryonic stem cells." At Wake Forest University, researchers have used adult stem cells to "grow" a functioning human bladder. As for the triumphs of embryonic stem cells... well, we're still waiting--but patients don't need to wait with adult stem cells. ![]()
Additional Resources
Wake Forest Scientists Discover New Type of Stem Cells
Doctors in the state of New Jersey are under no obligation to tell their patients the truth about their unborn children, according to yesterday's unanimous ruling by the state Supreme Court. In the 5-0 decision, justices said the court, "will not place a duty on doctors when there is no consensus in the medical community or among the public" on when life begins. The suit was filed in response to a botched abortion suffered by a New Jersey woman at the hands of a physician who misled her about the personhood of her unborn child. According to her testimony, when Dr. Sheldon Turkish advised her to have an abortion, she asked whether the "baby was already there." Turkish allegedly replied, "Don't be stupid, it's only blood." Seven weeks after the abortion, the women went to the hospital for excessive bleeding. Contrary to what Turkish told her, the physicians discovered that "parts of the baby" were still inside her. She sued Turkish for failing to provide her with accurate medical information before she consented to the abortion. In its final opinion, the court wrote, "On the profound issue of when life begins, this court cannot drive public policy in one particular direction by the engine of common law when the opposing side, which represent so many of our citizens are arrayed along a deep societal and philosophical divide." Interestingly enough, this same court didn't seem to mind "[driving] public policy in one particular direction" during the state's marriage debate last fall. In Lewis v. Harris, the justices did more than drive public policy on marriage--they rewrote it! In true dictatorial fashion, the court ordered the state's legislators to abandon democracy and grant homosexual couples the same rights as married spouses. One might ask where that same concern for the state's "deep societal and philosophical divide" was last October? Obviously, New Jersey's high court reserves its restraint for cases that aid the liberal cause.
![]()
Additional Resources
Top N.J. Court Reverses Abortion Ruling

“America is receiving Her apostles, prophets, and evangelists, but She has not yet seen Her Nazarites!” This audible voice from the Lord reverberated through my whole being, jarring me out of a deep sleep into a wakened attentiveness to the Holy Spirit. I knew
that the Lord had spoken to me.
In fact, God’s answer had come quickly to my heart’s searching the night before when my 13-year old son had asked permission with determined insistence to ...
You are not going to believe this, but it is TRUE:"...creating embryos purely for the purpose of research turns the embryo into nothing more than a research tool, and a source of raw biological material for experiments." –Dr. David King, Human Genetics Alert
News Staff/AH (September 5, 2007)
EDITOR'S NOTE: As the norm, we try to find positive reports and stories to post on Breaking Christian News, however, at times there will be prayer alerts that seem too important NOT to run. The sickening story below is one of those. One can only imagine the depravity that could arise as this research is given license, not to mention the disease and destruction that could be introduced into human genetics—even accidentally. And so we issue a call-to-prayer that this decision would be reversed so hybrid embryos would not be allowed or toyed-with in the UK, or anywhere. –Aimee Herd, BCN.
(United Kingdom)—If it was the premise of a horror movie, I wouldn't go see it. But, as surreal as this might seem, this disturbing method of research has been approved by the UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (Photo: BBC News)
According to an article from This Is London, Labour ministers recently changed their minds about outlawing human hybrid research, giving scientists who are licensed by the HFEA a green light to conduct disease-related experiments with embryos that are part human, part animal.
Those scientists wanting to conduct such research cited a shortage of human eggs used for experimentation, as the reason for the hybrid creations.
Dr Stephen Minger, of King's College, said, "I can understand why people are freaked out by this, but the embryos will never be implanted and the cells won't be used for therapy—this is about studying the development of diseases in a Petri dish."
However, Dr. David King, with Human Genetics Alert (a research watchdog group) noted, "We are not a pro-life group but creating embryos purely for the purpose of research turns the embryo into nothing more than a research tool, and a source of raw biological material for experiments."
Source: ThisisLondon.co.uk